Clinical Outcomes

CareVet Clinical Outcomes brings Veterinarians together to examine real cases, compare clinical approaches, learn from specialists, and turn everyday experiences into better care for the pets and families who depend on us.

Knowledge Fuels Better Outcomes.

CareVet Clinical Outcomes brings together real-world cases, peer insights, specialist perspectives, and shared learning to help veterinary professionals strengthen clinical decision-making and expand what is possible for patient care.

Advancing Care Together.

That knowledge becomes most powerful when it is shared across the profession. By bringing together Veterinarians, technicians, specialists, researchers, students, educators, and industry partners, we can learn from different perspectives and move veterinary medicine forward with one shared goal: delivering better outcomes for every pet.

Leading with Clinical Excellence.

Led by Dr. Kent Thornberry, Chief Veterinary Officer, CareVet

Great care doesn’t happen by chance. Across the CareVet network, experienced leaders and veterinary teams work together to advance clinical quality, support evidence-based medicine, and drive continuous improvement.

Through collaboration, education, and outcome-focused initiatives, we’re helping veterinary professionals deliver exceptional care—and helping more pets live healthier lives.

Clinical Outcomes Showcase

2026 Finalists

  • Veterinarian
    Category

    • Dr. Abhishek Chatterjee
    • Dr. Samantha Gruenwald
    • Dr. Michelle Thornberry
  • Veterinary Team
    Member Category

    • Sarah Wilmes
    • Alyscia Pew
    • Taylor Jenson
    • Amanda Bickford
  • Rising Scholars
    Category

    • Marcus McCaskill
    • Jordyn Purpura
    • Kristen Slagle
  • Veterinary
    Corporations Category

    • Ardent Animal Health
    • Boehringer Ingelheim
    • Pointer Health

Winners were selected through a double-blind review process conducted by an independent panel of respected general practice veterinarians, specialists, and industry professionals. Judges evaluated each submission anonymously, and individual scoring remained confidential throughout the process.